Ron Paul just told the FOX moderator that building an embassy in Baghdad larger than the Vatican does not necessarily qualify as defense spending. The audience cheered. Why don’t more people ask such questions about the rampant government waste so often categorized as “defense?” Why is Ron Paul the only candidate who asks these question?
Correlatively, why is Ron Paul the only candidate offering $1 trillion in spending cuts?
You do the math. Ron Paul already did.
-
smell-the-revolution reblogged this from ronpaulrevolution
-
kahikina reblogged this from ronpaulrevolution
-
deadeyedix liked this
-
alowisney liked this
-
xeternalsinx reblogged this from ronpaulrevolution
-
cbmilne33 liked this
-
cbmilne33 reblogged this from ronpaulrevolution
-
xeternalsinx liked this
-
godspeedjesse reblogged this from ronpaulrevolution
-
ronpaulrevolution posted this